From NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT
By Paul Homewood
h/t Paul Kolk
Blimey!! Ben Marlow has finally seen the light!
Sadiq Khan’s controversial Ultra-Low Emissions Zone scheme for London was supposed to put the rocket-boosters under electric car demand.
With the Mayor pressing ahead with a highly-contentious scheme that forces non-compliant petrol and diesel car drivers to pay an eye-watering £12.50 a day to drive into the capital, the expectation was that hundreds of thousands of motorists would rush out to their nearest forecourt and snap up an electric version, triggering an explosion in sales of Nissan Leafs, Teslas and other battery-powered models.
There was a spike in registrations of electric vehicles in July but otherwise the electric car boom that politicians, manufacturers, and campaigners insist is around the corner, remains something of a myth.
True, sales are steadily increasing but not in the vast numbers that proponents of electrification anticipated or would like to see.
Proportion of cars on UK roads
In fact, it is becoming increasingly apparent that the car industry has misjudged the scale of demand quite badly. Vertu, which is one of Britain’s biggest car dealerships, has become the latest big name to admit that the sector is already suffering from a dramatic oversupply of battery-powered vehicles.
Indeed supply is outstripping demand to such an extent, that prices are tumbling rapidly.
The warning follows the extraordinary decision of German car titan Volkswagen in July to halt electric vehicle production at its sprawling Emden factory in north-west Germany and lay off a fifth of its 1,500 employees after sales of electric models fell 30pc short of forecasts.
Unwanted electric cars are piling up on American forecourts too leaving some dealers to refuse further deliveries until the backlog has eased.
One hopes politicians the world over are paying attention because what we are witnessing is another example of how the top-down economics of net zero increasingly don’t stack up: with the introduction of an entirely arbitrary 2030 ban on petrol and diesel cars, the Government is forcing manufacturers to churn out millions of vehicles, regardless of whether the market actually exists or not.
The deadline should be scrapped without further ado. This “cart before the horse” approach of trying to stimulate demand by creating supply is the wrong way round and almost never works in business.
Start-up Britishvolt tried something similar, promising to build a giant battery factory in Blythe, on the Northumbrian coast that would churn out enough batteries every year to power 300,000 cars.
Yet there was an even bigger flaw at the heart of its plans: it had failed to secure a single order – a situation that hadn’t changed by the time it ran out of money at the start of the year.
It’s hard to fault the intentions of the great net-zero crusade – a greener planet is something everyone should want to see. But far too much of it is built on hope rather than reality.
The Government’s policy on wind energy has proved to be similarly divorced from fact. The Contracts for Difference scheme, which guarantees a fixed price for the electricity that is produced for 15 years, is an effective incentive during more benign times but when overheads are surging, as they are now, it quickly becomes an impediment to progress.
With ministers showing little willingness to bend on prices in the face of rampant cost increases, major projects are being ruthlessly abandoned.
The biggest setback has come off the Norfolk coast after Vattenfall announced it would shut down construction of its Boreas wind farm. The 1.4 gigawatt development was set to power around 1.5m homes but the Swedish energy outfit insists a 40pc surge in costs, driven by inflation, supply issues and rising wages means it is no longer viable.
Without more generous state subsidies others will surely follow suit, shattering Britain’s stated ambitions to nearly quadruple offshore wind capacity from 14GW currently to 50GW by the end of the decade.
Yet perhaps nothing underlines the Alice in Wonderland disconnection of ministers more than the campaign to force the population to green their homes with heat pumps.
Even a ban on the sale of new oil boilers from 2026 has failed to convince people to make the shift largely because the cost of converting your home can be huge, so too the disruption and upheaval from having one installed, while much of the technology suffers from several major flaws.
It might explain why, in spite of a Government scheme that pays bungs of between £5,000 and £6,000 per household, less than 14,000 vouchers have been claimed since it was launched in May last year.
Naive politicians aren’t the only ones. Virtuous investors have wasted huge sums on other ‘green’ innovations such as fake meat that have turned out to be busts.
Perhaps the venture capital industry has got better at picking winners, though that seems doubtful. At one stage it could hardly have been worse.
A study by the American academic Ben Gaddy in 2016 found that of the $25bn ploughed into so-called “clean-tech” ventures, 90pc were abject failures, and close to all of them could be considered poor investments.
Here in the UK, the problem is compounded by our willingness to remain silent as more productive hi-tech industries that Britain should be building its future on are auctioned off to the highest bidders.
The takeovers in quick succession of Cambridge-based biotech firm Abcam by an American rival and of Staffordshire drug IT specialist Instem by French private equity make a mockery of our ambition to be a life-sciences powerhouse. This country’s help-yourself attitude to opportunistic foreign raiders has to end.
Equally, perhaps the time has come to accept that the economics of net zero are more fantasy than reality.
It’s a pity Marlow and his likes were not banging the drum years ago, before we were lumbered with Net Zero nonsense.
Sadiq Khan’s controversial Ultra-Low Emissions Zone scheme… hits the night time economy
“”Overnight shift workers face paying Ulez charge twice, Sadiq Khan warned
Night Time Industry Association has urged London’s mayor to ‘incorporate a rolling 24-hour period’ that doesn’t ‘penalise’ night staff””
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/08/29/ulez-expansion-overnight-workers-could-pay-twice-sadiq-khan/
Khan is probably counting on the protests fizzling out before May’s election
New business opportunities
“”Transport for London (TfL) says it has found no evidence of fraud within its own ranks, as reports emerged of criminals offering drivers a way of avoiding Ultra low emission zone (Ulez) charges.
A Sky News investigation found that fraudsters selling counterfeit exemption certification for the newly-expanded clean air zone are advertising widely on social media.””
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/ulez-ultra-low-emission-zone-fraud-adverts-tfl-london-b1104338.html
It wouldn’t be surprising if those license plate covers that are said to prevent red light and speed camera pics aren’t selling like hotcakes to Londoners…..
It’s one thing to destroy the cameras, and yet another thing to block them from being able to read plates.
How does the Great Khan move about? I’m guessing a taxpayer armored vehicle? His cousin Genghis used a mere one horsepower vehicle.
It’s a Range Rover – and yes, it is enhanced
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/cars/news/sadiq-khan-wont-have-to-pay-the-ulez-charge-london-mayors-taxpayer-funded-luxury-2020-range-rover-is-exempt-from-the-1250-a-day-fee/ar-AA1fPIXr
Isn’t Range Rover a Ford now?
Bit out of date Kevin, Ford sold Land Rover to Tata Industries in 2008
ULEZ…The Great Kahn on Society
That is, if he is thinking at all!
“It’s hard to fault the intentions of the great net-zero crusade – a greener planet is something everyone should want to see. But far too much of it is built on hope rather than reality.”
The planet is already greener due to increased carbon dioxide and net zero is built on the fallacies that carbon dioxide levels control climate and that all recent additions of it are due to burning fossil fuels.
Alarmists/Greens are very confused.
If they want a greener planet, they should want more CO2 in the atmosphere.
Net Zero is counterproductive to a greener planet.
Alarmists should relax. We are headed for an even greener planet thanks to China, India, and all the other rational nations of the world who use oil, gas and coal without restrictions.
they are not confused – as the former head of the UNIPCC stated – the goal of the environmental movement is more about the sestruction of capitalism than the climate – everything these globalists/communists, including Buyden & his cronies, do makes perfect sense with this statement in mind
You are correct. The pitiful protest on the Nevada highway had a sign that said “End Capitalism.” It is a major platform for the greenies.
It’s hard to fault the intentions of the great net-zero crusade –.
__________________________________________________
Really?
Hopium is never in short supply.
Very, very clever. Permission to re-use?
The intentions are stupd so they should be faulted. And the results are horrific.
It’s likely that he had to put that in to get the piece accepted by the editors.
Sad to see that hybrid sales are not taking off but idiot Boris Johnson announced the intention to ban them in the near future in favour of fueling the economy by flatulent unicorns. They really are a joy to drive and do give much better mpg than straight ICE
Maybe the cost has something to do with it
Also, range, available charging points and flammability enter into the equation. The smooth ride is almost a given due to the increased weight.
As far as joy of driving is concerned, I’d rather drive one of several sports cars still available with ICE and manual transmission.
Great video! There is nothing like Driving a responsive machine with a manual transmission.
We picked up a 2000 9-5 5 speed SAAB at the factory in Trollhattan and drove it down thru most of northern Europe for 3 weeks, eventually dropping it off in Paris for transfer to the US. Put on 4K miles on the autobahns. At 150 kmh for 4 hours/day, that machine handled like a cat. The Swiss alps were a lot of fun.
Finally had to junk it when the frame and steering rack rusted out in 2018.
Nowadays most everything in the US is auto transmission
For everyday driving, the thrill is gone…
I’m happier listening to podcasts while the car controls its engine. I’ll be glad if it drove itself too – I do the same drive 200 times a year. Just make the economics work.
My ride is a ’95 Honda Del Sol with a curb weight of 2800 #. The only time the roof is on is when I am towing it behind my motor home.
It does not get any better than driving on the beach.
Are you high already? EVs are a total failure. Not a single one of them can compete with a real vehicle.
Have you ever driven one? They aren’t made for the Great American Road Trip to Yellowstone, but they sure do work for everyday driving around town. Besides that, the performance is phenomenal.
Yes Tesla have the EV upmarket buyer nailed in Oz (and elsewhere) particularly with their charger rollout. The problem is Oz buyers paying $66k for the first Standard Range Plus Model 3s in 2019 are battling to get half price for them now as they come off lease and the numbers for private sale grow on Carsales. The realisation of that sort of depreciation compared to say Toyota hybrids has certainly cooled the ardour of many and once bitten twice shy particularly with high interest rates.
Sounds like a good time to buy for half price.
Clearly you are high. Lay down the pipe and go dry out.
I’d love a Tesla if I could afford one.
They are useful, provided your commutes are short, you have an off street place to park that isn’t in a parking garage or home garage and you can afford a second vehicle for the many things EVs can’t do.
They do work for driving around town – if you don’t want to have fun doing it.
Yes – they accelerate great. Not a whole lot of places in town where that acceleration potential is useful.
They corner like crap at speed. Drifting in one will ruin your wallet – and your mate’s pocketbook at the same time. And yes – I loved drifting around corners in LA suburbs with my 2005 Chrysler SRT. Can’t believe I never got a ticket doing that!
My ’87 Buick GN was awesome in a straight line! Cornered horribly, but at least didn’t cost me a fortune in tires.
An awfully expensive grocery cart.
I thought he was referring to non plug in hybrids…
Huh? You need to define what you mean by “compete”.
No, you need to pull your head out of your rectum, sweetie. You want to play with toy? Do that. No EV being sold anywhere can match my van or truck. Period. Full stop. And spares us all the Ford Lightening bullshit, nobody wants that crap.
I heard a story about who dropped $80-large on a Lightening and then decided to take his family on the big vacation with it. The charging was so idiotic the guy, in the middle of his vacation, went and rented a real F-150 and finished the trip.
i/a guy/
A non-plugin hybrid without lithium batteries, would not be a bad idea. It would save you the trouble of having to plug the car into electricity, and would save you the problem of batteries catching on fire. And you would have the range of a gasoline-powered vehicle and the ease of refilling. The Toyota hybrids fill this bill.
But, of course, some alarmist fanatics even want to do away with non-plugin hybrids. They want plugin only. The CO2-phobes really have gone crazy.
Our old 2010 Ford Escape got about 20 mpg. Our new Ford Hybrid Escape gets over 40 mpg.
The big guy doesn’t like it. He doesn’t want any gasoline, but he does want to include a kill switch should you really wish to escape.
Does the UK build cars?
Why do articles such as this one conflate wind and solar capacity with production? The 1.4 gigawatt Boreas wind farm was clearly not set to power 1.5 million homes as stated. At best it would operate at about 30% capacity on average which means that it could power about 500,000 homes on average but zero homes some of the time. What are the zero guys supposed to do when that happens? While well intentioned I suppose, this article continues to misinform readers about what wind power can actually do which is to supply electric power some of the time and no electric power some of the time with the split between these extremes unknown and unknowable.
Yes, wind and solar have electrical dysfunction. The grid only stays up with hydrocarbon energy.
Coal isn’t a hydrocarbon, neither is atomic power. Other forms such has geothermal and hydro electric require the right geography.
Coal is a hydrocarbon. NTTIAWWT.
Are we on this again? Please look at the definition of hydrocarbon within the subject of organic chemistry. Then look at the molecular composition of coal.
I agree that atomic power, geothermal and hydroelectric are not hydrocarbon powered, but without hydrocarbons, these could not be built in the first place.
Beside, my response was sort of tongue in cheek (not my tongue).
Please note the chemical structure of coal has carbon and hydrogen in it.
Bituminous coal has a composition of about 84.4% carbon, 5.4% hydrogen, 6.7% oxygen, 1.7% nitrogen, and 1.8% sulfur,
Explain why it is not a hydrocarbon.
Oh, he’s just sayin that to make a funny…
Or nuclear….
There are few people who know what a gigawatt is who do not also understand wind and solar capacity vs production. That said, yes, it’s annoying when writers pretend they don’t know the meaning of the words they write.
When both major parties have the same policy, voting the fools out is not a real option.
We need a voting option of “NONE OF THE ABOVE”
Then no-one can accuse of ys getting the politicians that we vote for
That’s the problem we face.
It’s called “Idiocracy”. And we’ve got it in spades.
ULEZ
90% of vehicles travelling through London ULEZ will be compliant already.
Khan has arranged those not meeting requirements to have help with vehicle upgrades.
Most petrol cars after 2005 and diesel cars after ~2020 are already compliant.
It is old cars that are not compliant to ULEZ standards
vehicles meeting standards:
Ways to meet the standard – Transport for London (tfl.gov.uk)
As he says, if he wanted to make more money then he would have expanded congestion charge areas – within a few years all vehicles will be compliant with ULEZ and there would be no extra revenue.
City hall lies and buys the scientific conclusions it desires
TfL has no data for the surrounding counties
Mr. frunt: Yeah, obviously the folks complaining are just liars. Just like those liars who complain that EU standards are being imposed on Brits in spite of brexit. What were those vehicle compliance standards again??
You are posting pure propaganda and we know it. Keep wasting your time, as you like.
All these vehicles meet the ULEZ criteria
It is not a battery vehicle only requirement.
sports car? Mazda MX-5 1.8 Montana 2dr 2003 (03 reg) is ulez compliant!
You don’t understand this at all, do you?
Why pretend that you do? Is it ego?
A 20 year old Mazda MX-5 1.8 is not ULEZ compliant.
But a 15 year old Mazda MX-5 1.8 is.
Best ULEZ Compliant Cars UK 2023 | Top Gear
You guys ought to stop downvoting on reflex and recognise that, in this case, ghalfrunt is completely correct. 90% of cars are ULEZ compliant. There is help for the minority that aren’t.
One point that ghalfrunt has not made that ought to be recognised is the impact on vans used for business.
ULEZ costs are tax deductible. So, if you are driving into the ULEZ zone for worjk purposes it does not cost you.
“Tax deductible” does not mean mean “it does not cost you”.
I somehow doubt that you are in business if you think being tax deductible reduces your costs. If your deductibles exceed your tax payable then the overage is lost and so are the costs that that deductible offsets.
Does a tax deduction in the UK reduce the tax payable by the entire amount?
In Australia, a tax deduction just reduces the taxable income by that amount. If my marginal tax rate is 30% and I pay $100 for something which is tax deductible, it reduces my taxable income by $100, but only reduces the tax payable by $30. It winds up costing me $70.
In the US, there are tax credits that are directly subtracted from taxes owed. A tax deduction subtracts from your income before taxes are calculated.
Thanks for that. I had assumed that was how the tax credits work, so it’s nice to have confirmation.
Let’s say you are in the 20% tax bracket.
If you spend 1000 pounds a year on this tax, then the government will allow you to pretend that your total income was 1000 pounds smaller. This will save you 200 pounds, meaning you are still out 800 pounds.
This tax would alsp be yet another reason not to shop downtown.
You are all correct.
I meant “it doesn’t cost you as much”.
The issue remains, ULEZ affects almost nobody and there is help for those whom it does.
“ULEZ affects almost nobody” So it’s pointless. An all Khan’s attempts to present it as saving thousands of lives, and his deputy’s attempts to browbeat Imperial College researchers to change the findings of their report, can be seen for what they were. And the cost to ratepayers for this pointless scheme is? (But don’t forget Khan has already been caught out trying to recruit for his road use scheme – he can’t even be honest about his intentions).
When politicians introduce taxes, they never take them away.
Taxes should not be funding delusion, stupidity and fraud.
… and toll roads
…. and lotteries
“The money will all go to ” something everyone loves. Until next year.
You are, of course, aware that Sadiq Khan was interested in going even further, introducing a zero emissions zone, before determining his re-election chances would also be zero? That would have brought in far more revenue as very few vehicles could comply.
The ULEZ natives seem to be restless:
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-66675787
“There have been 171 reports of crimes relating to Ulez cameras logged since 17 August, the Met Police has said.
The BBC previously revealed that more than 300 cameras had been vandalised between April and mid-August.
The actual number of cameras affected is likely to be even higher as one report can represent attacks on multiple cameras.
London Mayor Sadiq Khan’s Ultra Low Emission Zone expanded across all of the capital’s boroughs on 29 August.”
end excerpt
Gee Half Runt, I hadn’t noticed you posting here for a long time. Right back to your old standards I see.
I’ve noticed a lot of trolls returning after a long absence. I wonder if Soros’ check finally cleared?
You can follow Paul Homewood From NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT on twitter (X) Notalotofpeopleknowthat (@Notalotofpeopl1) / X (twitter.com)
Add to this his surveillance cameras to enforce this crap are being destroyed faster than they can be replaced and the failure is spectacular, yet again. Leftards never learn unless you make the lessons painful and personally expensive for them.
I had read this was happening elsewhere (~90% destruction rate), good to see some confirmation.
Yeah it looks like about a quarter of the ULEZ cameras in the expansion zone have been destroyed or stolen so far, with almost a dozen more each week. That doesn’t seem like much but it is localised – 90% of cameras installed in 2 areas have been damaged or removed whilst other areas have had none of theirs affected at all.
How does it look in Tooting? Not that I’m accusing my friend Strativarius of any heroic, ahem, reprehensible vandalism, mind you.
British Volt have been bought out by Australian firm Recharge Industries. As the article states, this is another in a very long line of UK firms being bought by foreign companies. Hard to see that this would happen elsewhere.
You mean like American uranium or farmland being sold to the Chinese?
We are lumbered with Net Zero nonesense because our MPs are almost all innumerate and scientifically illiterate, and they thought it sounded like a Nice Thing. They nodded it through, unscrutinized and unopposed. Who would oppose a Nice Thing?
Well-informed journalism would be good, but if we have politicians who rely on journalists to explain stuff to them what is the point of MPs? What is the point of an upper chamber?
We need a better educated political class.
True.
But remember, the larval state of a politician is a lawyer. The laws is administered by the technically inept, too.
And that is the root of the problem. Lawyers are trained to hold a wealth of knowledge and use it as fit for defence or prosecution – not to accept it as a guide to truth. Legal training is the opposite of a scientific mindset.
a bankrupt world simply cannot contiue to subsidize unsustainable industries
Is the automobile industry being mandated toward a Death Spiral?
The passion for electric vehicles to help achieve lower emissions in wealthy countries seems to be oblivious to the potentially insurmountable and uncontrollable challenges facing the automobile industry.
Zero emissions at ANY COST seems to be the direction being mandated by governments and the Environmental, Social and Governance movements around the world, to divest in fossil fuels.
https://www.heartland.org/news-opinion/news/is-the-automobile-industry-being-mandated-toward-a-death-spiral
“Top Down” economics NEVER works.
Neither does Biden’s “From the Middle Out”.
Both are attempts to make progress by pushing on a rope.
Don’t forget Trudeau, growing the economy “from the heart.”
All nonsense designed to appeal to emotion and bypass the brain
Equally, perhaps the time has come to accept that the economics of net zero are more fantasy than reality.
Nobody says that better than Mark Mills-
Mark P Mills: Grand Nexus: Information, Materials, Energy | Tom Nelson Pod #141 – YouTube
Flaying the idiots with the bleeding obvious.
So, can someone explain to me how the lowest cost power known to man needs state subsidies of any kind, never mind “more generous” ones?
Surely Nick Stokes is reading this and is doing a DeNiro thing in the mirror to amp himself up to weave a tapestry of verbal diarrhea for you.
All you need is faith, belief, and ignore Germany de-industrializing and the Oz grid operator warning of blackouts soon.
I’m sure there is a perfectly logical explanation that will involve much fog about power that is too cheap to meter.
EV ? Meh… here’s my ULEZ exempt classic….
Build new fossil fuel and nuclear generators, remove all wind and solar from the grid and scrap 90% of EVs.
Six controversial ideas in one sentence.
Mayor of London attempts to spur massive spending on Japanese and American products? Huh?
Another mid-road electric car failure, from The Telegraph:
Tesla breaks down mid-turn and causes more than nine hours of travel chaos
The article seems to blame the electronic parking brake (handbrake), which could not be disengaged without battery power. I’m not sure if I buy this excuse. It’s my understanding that electric vehicles don’t have a neutral gear position like a standard ICE vehicle. The electric motors driving the wheels cannot be disengaged, making the vehicle virtually impossible to push.
Just to point out Marlow has the ULEZ charge very wrong. The extension to greater London means that as soon as you get in your car and move it you are liable to pay the ULEZ daily fee. Marlow said when you drive into London which is the congestion charge. So the daily ULEZ charge is £12.50 and if you want to drive into London add another £15.
I initially thought ULEZ was a sexual pronoun