Essay by Eric Worrall
But where is the compassion for families being ruined by energy poverty and unaffordable renewable energy?
Traduzione in lingua inglese
I have the honour to read the Address that His Holiness Pope Francis prepared for this occasion:
Mr President,
Mr Secretary-General of the United Nations,
Distinguished Heads of State and Government,
Ladies and Gentlemen,
Sadly, I am unable to be present with you, as I had greatly desired. Even so, I am with you, because time is short. I am with you because now more than ever, the future of us all depends on the present that we now choose. I am with you because the destruction of the environment is an offence against God, a sin that is not only personal but also structural, one that greatly endangers all human beings, especially the most vulnerable in our midst and threatens to unleash a conflict between generations. I am with you because climate change is “a global social issue and one intimately related to the dignity of human life” (Apostolic Exhortation Laudate Deum, 3). I am with you to raise the question which we must answer now: Are we working for a culture of life or a culture of death? To all of you I make this heartfelt appeal: Let us choose life! Let us choose the future! May we be attentive to the cry of the earth, may we hear the plea of the poor, may we be sensitive to the hopes of the young and the dreams of children! We have a grave responsibility: to ensure that they not be denied their future.
It has now become clear that the climate change presently taking place stems from the overheating of the planet, caused chiefly by the increase of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere due to human activity, which in recent decades has proved unsustainable for the ecosystem. The drive to produce and possess has become an obsession, resulting in an inordinate greed that has made the environment the object of unbridled exploitation. The climate, run amok, is crying out to us to halt this illusion of omnipotence. Let us once more recognize our limits, with humility and courage, as the sole path to a life of authentic fulfilment.
What stands in the way of this? The divisions that presently exist among us. Yet a world completely connected, like ours today, should not be un-connected by those who govern it, with international negotiations that “cannot make significant progress due to positions taken by countries which place their national interests above the global common good” (Encyclical Letter Laudato Si’, 169). We find ourselves facing firm and even inflexible positions calculated to protect income and business interests, at times justifying this on the basis of what was done in the past, and periodically shifting the responsibility to others. Yet the task to which we are called today is not about yesterday, but about tomorrow: a tomorrow that, whether we like it or not, will belong to everyone or else to no one.
Particularly striking in this regard are the attempts made to shift the blame onto the poor and high birth rates. These are falsities that must be firmly dispelled. It is not the fault of the poor, since the almost half of our world that is more needy is responsible for scarcely 10% of toxic emissions, while the gap between the opulent few and the masses of the poor has never been so abysmal. The poor are the real victims of what is happening: we need think only of the plight of indigenous peoples, deforestation, the tragedies of hunger, water and food insecurity, and forced migration. Births are not a problem, but a resource: they are not opposed to life, but for life, whereas certain ideological and utilitarian models now being imposed with a velvet glove on families and peoples constitute real forms of colonization. The development of many countries, already burdened by grave economic debt, should not be penalized; instead, we should consider the footprint of a few nations responsible for a deeply troubling “ecological debt” towards many others (cf. ibid., 51-52). It would only be fair to find suitable means of remitting the financial debts that burden different peoples, not least in light of the ecological debt that they are owed.
Ladies and Gentlemen, allow me to speak to you, as brothers and sisters, in the name of the common home in which we live, and to ask this question: What is the way out of this? It is the one that you are pursuing in these days: the way of togetherness, multilateralism. Indeed, “our world has become so multipolar and at the same time so complex that a different framework for effective cooperation is required. It is not enough to think only of balances of power… It is a matter of establishing global and effective rules (Laudate Deum, 42). In this regard, it is disturbing that global warming has been accompanied by a general cooling of multilateralism, a growing lack of trust within the international community, and a loss of the “shared awareness of being… a family of nations” (SAINT JOHN PAUL II, Address to the United Nations Organization for the Fiftieth Anniversary of its Establishment, New York, 5 October 1995, 14). It is essential to rebuild trust, which is the foundation of multilateralism.
This is true in the case of care for creation, but also that of peace. These are the most urgent issues and they are closely linked. How much energy is humanity wasting on the numerous wars presently in course, such as those in Israel and Palestine, in Ukraine and in many parts of the world: conflicts that will not solve problems but only increase them! How many resources are being squandered on weaponry that destroys lives and devastates our common home! Once more I present this proposal: “With the money spent on weapons and other military expenditures, let us establish a global fund that can finally put an end to hunger” (Encyclical Letter Fratelli Tutti, 262; cf. SAINT PAUL VI, Encyclical Letter Populorum Progressio, 51) and carry out works for the sustainable development of the poorer countries and for combating climate change.
It is up to this generation to heed the cry of peoples, the young and children, and to lay the foundations of a new multilateralism. Why not begin precisely from our common home? Climate change signals the need for political change. Let us emerge from the narrowness of self-interest and nationalism; these are approaches belonging to the past. Let us join in embracing an alternative vision: this will help to bring about an ecological conversion, for “there are no lasting changes without cultural changes” (Laudate Deum, 70). In this regard, I would assure you of the commitment and support of the Catholic Church, which is deeply engaged in the work of education and of encouraging participation by all, as well as in promoting sound lifestyles, since all are responsible and the contribution of each is fundamental.
Brothers and sisters, it is essential that there be a breakthrough that is not a partial change of course, but rather a new way of making progress together. The fight against climate change began in Rio de Janeiro in 1992, and the 2015 Paris Agreement represented “a new beginning” (ibid., 47). Now there is a need to set out anew. May this COP prove to be a turning point, demonstrating a clear and tangible political will that can lead to a decisive acceleration of ecological transition through means that meet three requirements: they must be “efficient, obligatory and readily monitored” (ibid., 59). And achieved in four sectors: energy efficiency; renewable sources; the elimination of fossil fuels; and education in lifestyles that are less dependent on the latter.
Please, let us move forward and not turn back. It is well-known that various agreements and commitments “have been poorly implemented, due to the lack of suitable mechanisms for oversight, periodic review and penalties in cases of non-compliance” (Laudato Si’, 167). Now is the time no longer to postpone, but to ensure, and not merely to talk about the welfare of your children, your citizens, your countries and our world. You are responsible for crafting policies that can provide concrete and cohesive responses, and in this way demonstrate the nobility of your role and the dignity of the service that you carry out. In the end, the purpose of power is to serve. It is useless to cling to an authority that will one day be remembered for its inability to take action when it was urgent and necessary to do so (cf. ibid., 57). History will be grateful to you. As will the societies in which you live, which are sadly divided into “fan bases”, between prophets of doom and indifferent bystanders, radical environmentalists and climate change deniers… It is useless to join the fray; in this case, as in the case of peace, it does not help to remedy the situation. The remedy is good politics: if an example of concreteness and cohesiveness comes from the top, this will benefit the base, where many people, especially the young, are already dedicated to caring for our common home.
May the year 2024 mark this breakthrough. I like to think that a good omen can be found in an event that took place in 1224. In that year, Francis of Assisi composed his “Canticle of the Creatures”. By then Francis was completely blind, and after a night of physical suffering, his spirits were elevated by a mystical experience. He then turned to praise the Most High for all those creatures that he could no longer see, but knew that they were his brothers and sisters, since they came forth from the same Father and were shared with other men and women. An inspired sense of fraternity thus led him to turn his pain into praise and his weariness into renewed commitment. Shortly thereafter, Francis added a stanza in which he praised God for those who forgive; he did this in order to settle – successfully – an unbecoming conflict between the civil authorities and the local bishop. I too, who bear the name Francis, with the heartfelt urgency of a prayer, want to leave you with this message: Let us leave behind our divisions and unite our forces! And with God’s help, let us emerge from the dark night of wars and environmental devastation in order to turn our common future into the dawn of a new and radiant day. Thank you.
Source: https://press.vatican.va/content/salastampa/it/bollettino/pubblico/2023/12/02/0848/01842.html#inglese
Pope Francis was too ill to deliver this speech in person to COP28. Perhaps he should consider retirement.
Many of the “rich” nations Pope Francis expects to fund these “ecological” remittances to debt ridden poor countries are themselves suffering brutal energy poverty, thanks to politically unhinged Western attempts to embrace impossibly expensive and unreliable renewables.
Yet Pope Francis has not one word of compassion for the victims of the green policies promoted by his papacy, pensioners and poor people in places like Britain and Germany, who are being forced to choose between heating and eating. Dragging rich nations into poverty will not alleviate the suffering of poor nations. Only that economic development Pope Francis so despises can help the poor, as has been proven many times in the history of the world, in Asia and elsewhere.
Dear Mr Pope. Ask not what Karl Marx would do, instead ask that of St Frances. He would say “Pope liquidate your wealth, give it all to the poor.” Mr Pope. Some facts. World poverty has largely been eliminated, and was done by capitalists. So sad, but so true.
The rich capitalists are the main ones pushing the “climate change” agenda.
They own the media and control the politicians with their big campaign contributions.
The estimated cost of stopping warming by 2050 is $US200-300 trillion, and the rich hope to make trillions from that “climate change” spending.
I suspect it has more to do with control of humanity. How can the Pope exclaim “Choose Life” when not just a fringe within the so called Green movement openly advocates depopulation and deindustrialization, which will quickly kill millions and promote strife. What a useful idiot.
Respectfully, you misspelled “billions.”
Apparently also misspelled “evil worthless scumbag” ?
scvblwxq,
Those aren’t capitalists; they are totalitarians or Fascists! What the Marxists like to denigrate with the term “capitalism” is more properly named economic freedom! Totalitarians of the Left and the Right try to subvert freedom for their own enrichment; those of us in the radical center believe in optimizing liberty and prosperity for the benefit of all!
They are very fascist with totalitarian tendencies.
Fascists are by definition, totalitarians. It’s the only way you can get people to line up behind the socialists solutions.
What is it with people these days. They automatically assume that anyone with money must be a capitalist.
Those rich “capitalists” are socialists through and through. Not a single capitalistic bone in their bodies.
ANyone who’s solution to any problem is more government, is a socialist, not a capitalist.
“The estimated cost of INCAPABLY stopping warming by 2050″…
Since 1980 the fastest GDP growth per cap has been in China, what is common to all economic growth has been the growth in energy use, mostly due to fossil fuel use.
Not My Pope. How can a church that brought us John Paul II elect this guy?
Power corrupts. The whole idea of political church leaders vying to be the one in charge is an affront to religion.
That picture of the Pope above is very flattering. I saw a current one the other day and it appeared that he had consumed a good part of Michael Moore.
Michael Moore by the way has lost a lot of weight – good for him – so it is possible.
The title of that flattering portrait is:
“Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing”
“Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing” – The story of Saul Alinsky, the father of community organizing, and the rise of his Cultural Marxism in the Catholic Church and America.
I agree. Maybe the Vatican needs to have a several hour long power outage.
St John Paul II pray for us!
Apparently the College of Cardinals hadn’t heard that a man cannot be both a Marxist and a Catholic! Why they put the Church of Rome under a committed ideologue will be debated for centuries; whether the church will survive this self-inflicted wound will be obvious much sooner!
I rather think Bergoglio is a Peronist fascist socialist, rather than a Marxist-Leninist.
No, he’s a Marxist. He comes out of the Liberation Theology movement, which grew from “Catholic-Marxist dialogue” in the ’60s.
Mussolini used to be a writer for the Italian socialist newspaper. Fascists are socialists, just not Marxists, despite what Stalinists claim.
Fascists might be socialists, but they aren’t Marxists.
Socialism is just one step on the road to marxism, a very big step.
There are two varieties of socialists: national socialists and marxist socialists. They both have exactly the same method of operation: identify the target group, kill all of them and steal everything they owned. The difference is very simple: nationalists target the Jews; marxists target the bourgeois.
Other than that minor difference, they are the same thing. Both are totalitarian, that is everything is owned by and controlled by the State. The perfect socialism was Plato’s Republic, so this totalitarian ideal has been around for a long time.
Because everything is devoted to the State, socialism has a permanent war with the concept of family and the Church. Both of these detract from what should be the complete focus of the individual: the State.In this area of eradication of organized religion and the family unit, Hitler, Stalin and Mao were in perfect agreement.
If Francis be followed by yet another Commie pope, Roman Catholicism might enjoy or endure another schism.
Just more lefty cancel culture-
Pope Francis punishes Cardinal Burke, revokes Vatican apartment and salary | America Magazine
and sucking up to Commies-
Vatican confirms renewal of contested accord with China on bishops’ appointments | Reuters
If you can’t deal with criticism then you have no business being in any position of leadership.
Making deals with totalitarians is nothing new for the Catholic Church. Read the Concordat of 1933 wherein all bishops in Germany were ordered to swear an oath of fealty to the German Reich. Read Article 16.
https://www.newadvent.org/library/docs_ss33co.htm
Cardinal Eugenio Pacelli who negotiated the agreement, later became Pope Pius XII. Paul VI and later John Paul II chose to put Pius XII on the path to sainthood.
Bergoglio was raised under Peron, a cut rate neoFascist. So his understanding of economics is as deficient as his knowledge of science.
Interesting that the man who is supposed to represent Christ says so little of Him…”My kingdom is not of this world…” And ” repent and believe in Me”, instead like the Pharisees focused on a physical kingdom. But then again, this pontiff has never been about Christ.
Of course not. Jesus is all about truth (in this context, data-driven, bona fide, science).
When you peddle in the lies of the “renewables” gang and the half-truths of the “Lukewarmists,” you can’t bring in Someone Who soundly condemns your behavior.
Francis COULD mention his apparent mentor (perhaps, he will), The Father of Lies.
Does the Pope believe God is sovereign and in control of our world?
Does he believe what Jesus taught about God in the Sermon on the Mount?
Jesus sums up the providence of God in a key verse:
“he makes his sun rise on the evil and on the good,
and sends rain on the just and on the unjust.“ (Matthew 5:45)
The Pope is selective, with either a partial quote or no mention at all of these words.
In Laudate Deum (2023) he neither quotes these words nor explains God’s providence.
In Laudato Si’ (2015) he quotes half of the verse but again does not explain providence.
Why did he avoid the underlined words? Why only a snippet from Matthew 6:25-34 which misses the point of God’s providence towards people in the passage?
The Pope uses the word “provide” a number of times in both documents but not once the word “providence” and each time he is speaking of people providing but never God. Yet providence is a central teaching not only in the Sermon on the Mount but throughout the Bible.
One cannot believe in a sovereign Creator who is responsible for day and night, seasons and days and years, who has control over all weather conditions and shows his kindness to all people with sunshine and rain and a harvest from their labors and be a climate alarmist.
Climate alarmists who profess to be Christians can only justify their views by ignoring the teachings of the Christian Scriptures or twist them fit their alarmism.
Excellent point, Michael.
Answer: He believes in money. As Jesus said, one cannot serve both God and Money (when their wills conflict). When Francis realized that obeying God and genuinely helping the poor weren’t what Money demanded, he effectively said:
“Truth be damned. As for me and my house, we will serve –Money.”
You’ve hit the nail in the head (is that how you say it?)
Lead by example, and hock the Vatican. Keep 10% aside for settlement of ongoing and future child abuse suits.
How did brandon get into this mix?
Heh. In this case, the pope is his own “Big Guy.”
Gee, I thought the Pope was supposed to be Catholic….instead of a pagan nature-worshipper who believes in human sacrifice to pacify the earth. Silly me!
That said, this Pope must really love poor people – so much so that he wants there to be a whole lot more of them.
This pope cares about: Money.
(Roman Catholic Church has significant investment in “renewables”.)
Francis is, sadly, just another slimy sales rep for solar/wind/EV’s/”carbon storage” and like scams.
Well said, JM ! 🙂
Down there in the sewer like Mickey Man, Al Gore, the UN cretin, the Swab..
Greedy globalists, ALL of them !!
Thank you, BN2000! 😀
Janice, is it not just this pope that cares about money.
Five hundred years ago Martin Luther visited Rome and was shocked by the oppulence of the papacy. He commented about the building of the basilica of St. Peter:
“Why does not the pope, whose wealth is today greater than the wealth of the richest Crassus, build this one basilica of St. Peter with his own money rather than with the money of poor believers?”
[Crassus, a Roman general and patron of Julius Caesar was the wealthiest man in Rome]
Francis has no problem with the hardworking average workers of the world being squeezed to pay for the building of the new Temple of Net Zero. I doubt he will sell off the Vatican buildings and treasures that form the greatest art museum in the world to help pay to save the poor from climate change.
Yep.
There is an interesting book about animism in christianity:
When God Was a Bird: Christianity, Animism, and the Re-Enchantment of the World, by Wallace
Your comment somehow reminded me about it.
Are you trying for the “most moronic comment” title??
Remember, you have some well practiced nit-wits and bellboys and other AGW wastrels to compete with.
One thing I’ve noticed about warmunists, and leftists in general. They actually believe that they are experts in every subject that interests them.
MUN reads one book on a subject, and he becomes an expert in that subject and whatever book he reads is automatically infallible.
Reading one book on a subject can never make one an expert, just like watching one “documentary” cannot make you an expert.
You have to remember that the author has complete control over what “information” is presented to the reader/watcher. If they are dishonest, it’s trivial to show only the data that supports your conclusion, and to ignore everything else.
Not only that, but only the author’s interpretation of that data is shown.
It is just more mindless hallucinogenic fuelled SCINCE FANTASY. !
Just the sort of thing the generally brainless AGW believer/cultist would go for.
“The plea of the poor”
is for:
1. Decent jobs
and
2. Reliable, affordable, safe, energy and personal transportation.
All of which are provided ONLY by:
FREE* MARKET CAPITALISM.
*”Free” by definition includes respect for private property rights and freedom of contract and excludes confiscatory taxation.
This pope does not care for the trappings of wealth, before his health took a downturn he was out on the streets of Rome helping poor people. It is more correct to say he does not understand commerce or science, that is not his field, he follows others. Many Catholic charities were already into climate change long before his encyclical, if you look into the membership of the UN climate action network that has been around since 1989, you will find many Cristian charities involved.
(yeah, another comment — I really get worked up about people who claim to be Christians twisting doctrine/Scripture to promote greed and theft)
This pope is a lot like one of the 12 disciples:
“‘Why wasn’t this perfume sold and the money given to the poor?’ …
[Judas] did not say this because he cared about the poor, but because he was a thief; as keeper of the money bag, he used to help himself to what was put into it.”
John 12:5, 6
For someone that believes in a god that is all-powerful and the maker of all things plus he, apparently, is God’s representative on Earth with a direct line to the Almighty, why not just ask/tell/demand that his God corrects all of the ills he believes are our fault.
How ironic, the Pontiff pontificating about greed.
I thought our rewards were in the afterlife, so religion is a Culture of Death.
This is from an organisation whose vast wealth relies on taking money from the poor.
Much of its wealth is its vast collection of priceless art- along with being one of the biggest if not the biggest land owner in the world.
Most of the land the church owns, is the land it’s church buildings sit on.
Every other denomination is the same, including non-Christian denominations.
This pope came from the absurd philosophy of Liberation Theology. Crap like this is unsurprising.
Right on. The extremes of that thing are amazing. If not blatantly un-christian.
Always sad to see certain people playing the role of activist and making comments and opinions on political issues which risk alienating many people they are meant to represent. Such individuals include the Pope and King Charles.
And both are ultra-rich hypocrites who literally do not practice what they preach.
Well, one thing I am impressed about the Pope is that when he took “office” he decided to not live in the Papal palace, instead, in a small apartment- and he doesn’t wear the gay red shoes previous Popes always wore.
Hey, look, a red herring!
The world needs another John Paul II and not this current bozo that lectures about the evils of walls while living in a city state surrounded by one.
This is why poop didn’t go to the cop, he (at least) knew what was coming.
(He was actually preventing his own ‘ill-health’ by not going – I imagine the exploding head of your average pope could be ‘a bit messy’. If not his entire self exploding.)
<OMG – what a picture>
https://news.sky.com/story/cop28-head-says-there-is-no-science-to-suggest-phasing-out-fossil-fuels-is-the-only-way-to-achieve-key-climate-target-13021958
That was a long way of saying, I can’t be with you because I am unwell. His poor health is clearly affecting his ability to discern truth from fiction.
The poor he invokes with almost every sentence need energy to lift them out of that poverty. Denying them that simple remedy is what the Climate Alarmists are doing.
He is not on the right side of the debate unless his inner wish is to maintain poverty for some doctrinal purpose.
They will be sending the smoke up the chimney again very soon. Let us hope that smoke heralds a return to the path of truth. Let us hope the next Pope is brave enough to bring that truth to the masses he represents.
It’s not his poor health that impaired his ability to tell truth from fiction, not unless he’s been in poor health most of his life. It was his Marxist indoctrination way back when he was going to school. The first object of that is always to make the subject believe their fictions and never think clearly for himself.
I’m an atheist, so maybe it’s my own bias, but… Does this really sound like the one guy an almighty god chooses to speak to? Or does he sound like every other greasy left-wing politician?
I mean, he only mentions god twice, and only in passing. He highlights Encyclicals and Laudato’s but fails to mention a single verse from the Bible. In fact, I’d go so far as to say I don’t think this guy believes in god at all. Michael Knowles is a better representative of Catholicism than this old fraud, at least from what I can see.
“Does this really sound like the one guy an almighty god chooses to speak to?”
He doesn’t inspire any confidence in me.
He is a flawed human being, just like the rest of us.
There are flaws and then there are FLAWS. Advocating Net Zero is advocating for the deaths of hundreds of millions of people. Francis isn’t in this for the money, he’s in it for the slaughter: a new Holy Crusade against sinners whose outcome he hopes will be the unleashing of the Four Horseman of the Apocalypse.
As I already said up there, I’m catholic and this pope is a disgrace.
“But where is the compassion for families being ruined by energy poverty and unaffordable renewable energy?”
Christianity isn’t about the comforts of our lives- it’s about going to heaven. I don’t believe in heaven so I want to be comfortable now.
Hmmm . . . with winter coming on, I’m just wondering if Pope Francis has turned off the fossil fuel-powered heat in his Suite 201 of the Domus Sanctae Marthae, the official name of the Vatican’s guesthouse that was built in 1996.
Per the above article, the Pope stated “I am with you because the destruction of the environment is an offence against God, a sin that is not only personal but also structural, one that greatly endangers all human beings . . . (blah, blah, blah)”.
He can talk the talk, but does he walk the walk? . . . I think not.
The head of the Vatican (essentially a wealthy nation unto itself), wearing the most extravagant gowns and living in the height of luxury built on the theft of goods from poor congregants in undeveloped nations, calling others “greedy nationalists” is the most extraordinary feat of deflection one could witness.
To this Pope, the answer to every problem is the world seems to be socialism. Oddly enough, Karl Marx claimed that religion was used for “the exploitation and the stupefaction of the working class”. It seems the role for well-established, organized religions hasn’t changed much in a couple of centuries.
Pope Benedict XVI didn’t retire, he was forced out by the Marxists so this useful idiot could take his place. Good news is that there’s a rumbling in the church about Pope Francis being a shill for the Marxist cabal and unworthy of leading the flock.
I suppose the conclave wanted to ride the renewables gravy train and need to get rid of B16 indeed.
One thing is certain: it’s not just the sexual scandals, deeper and more dangerous movements are going on in the upper church.
Can the Pope change their name after they have been confirmed? If so, I’d like to suggest Pope Sauron the first.
My heart breaks for all my Catholic friends who are embarrassed by this Pope.
I don’t like this guy.
I’m catholic. This pope is a disgrace in all fronts.