Fascinating, isn’t it? The latest, greatest idea to hit the ‘green movement’ – and it’s borrowed from termites. Lund University just released a study stating that we can emulate the climate control used by termites in their mounds to create climate-smart buildings with a greater energy efficiency and a negligible carbon dioxide footprint.
These termite mounds are lauded for their sophisticated ventilation systems that supposedly regulate temperature and humidity. David Andréen, senior lecturer at the Department of Architecture and Built Environment at Lund University, waxes eloquent about the digitalisation of design, biological systems, and how they
provide an important model for how we can best utilise these possibilities.
https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/994749
According to the research published in Frontiers in Materials, the interiors of termite mounds consist of interconnected channels, tunnels, and air chambers. These are believed to capture wind energy for respiration – or exchanging oxygen and carbon dioxide with the environment. The researchers suggest that similar structures could be integrated into building walls to facilitate a new method of controlling airflow, heat, and moisture.
Andréen introduces the concept of creating climate-smart buildings by developing turbulent, dynamic, and variable systems. These systems would require minor energy provision and could be controlled by very small equipment. The control of these systems would only necessitate electronic control,
“without using mechanical components such as fans, valves.”
https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/994749
The research team evidently demonstrated how airflow interacts with geometry – how the parameters in a structure cause flows to arise and how these flows can be selectively regulated. Andréen suggests that this system could be a prerequisite for a
distributed system in which many small sensors and regulating devices are placed in the climate-adaptive building envelope through miniaturisation, durability/sustainability and cost reduction.
https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/994749
At this point, it must be asked: Can these principles really be applied to human architecture in a meaningful, scalable, and cost-effective manner? The report casually suggests that this revolution in architecture would be possible only with complex internal geometries achieved via 3D printing. Has anyone accounted for the resource requirements, carbon footprint, and scalability of such an approach? In light of these questions, one can’t help but recall a similar time when “bio-inspired” design led to a spate of buildings shaped like pinecones and seashells, with little to no practical benefits or sustainability improvements.
Andréen concludes with an almost reverent admiration for the termites’ “building process” that results in “extremely complex well-functioning ‘engineering masterpieces'” without centralised control or drawings. Well, insects they might be, but one must remember that termites have been around for millions of years, fine-tuning their constructions to their specific needs and environment, without the constraints of urban planning regulations, building codes, or market forces.
While the concept itself is intriguing, one must not forget to take into account the inherent complexities and realities of human architecture and urban development before crowning termites as our architectural messiahs. Until these climate-smart designs can demonstrate their viability in real-world applications – scaled up from termite-sized mounds to human-sized buildings, accounting for the myriad of regulations, cost considerations, and human comfort needs – one might take this research with a grain of sand… or should we say, a piece of wood?
Source: Lund University. “Climate-friendly air conditioning inspired by termites.” Lund University News, 2023. DOI: 10.3389/fmats.2023.1126974.
It’s an open access article if you wish go read it.
Termite-inspired metamaterials for flow-active building envelopes
David Andréen1* and Rupert Soar2
- 1BioDigital Matter, Department of Architecture and Built Environment, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- 2School of Architecture, Design, and the Built Environment, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, United Kingdom
In this article we investigate the performative potential of reticulated tunnel networks to act as drivers for selective airflows in building envelopes and thereby facilitate semi-passive climate regulation. We explore whether such transient flow can be used to create functionally graded metamaterials in bio-inspired, additively fabricated buildings. The tunnel networks are modelled on the egress complex found in the mound of certain macrotermite species. The hypothesis we explore is that oscillating airflow of low amplitude can be used to generate large scale turbulence within the network and thereby increase the mass transfer rates across the network. The hypothesis is tested through a series of 3-dimensional and 2-dimensional experiments where various geometries are exposed to a forced oscillation of the air or water column. The results are evaluated in the 3-dimesional experiments through tracer gas measurements, and in the 2-dimenstional experiments through visual qualitative assessment using fluorescein dye. We find that the oscillating fluid gives rise to large scale turbulence that causes a net mass transport across the tunnel network, and that this turbulence occurs when certain combinations of amplitude, frequency, and network geometry are achieved. Furthermore, we conclude that the net mass transfer is large enough to be functionally useful in a building envelope as a method to regulate either building interior climate or the envelope’s own microclimate.
1 Introduction
Emerging technologies in additive fabrication and computational design are opening up radical new possibilities for performative building envelopes, where intricate and (micro)site-specific geometries can enable the creation of functionally graded metamaterials (Soar and Andréen, 2012). Metamaterials are materials shaped in ways that give them properties not exhibited in their naturally occurring conditions. They have long been a concept meaningful primarily in small-scale, high-value engineering such as electronics or more recently mechanical engineering. However, with the emergence of additive fabrication technologies capable of producing complex geometries even at large volumes (current state-of-the-art powder bed printers can produce objects up to 8 cubic meters overnight, with exceptionally high resolution), there is a growing opportunity to implement these concepts in the construction industry.
In this paper we explore how such functionally graded metamaterials can potentially be modelled on the structures found in termite mounds. The large mound structures are created by termites to act as physiological organs that, through their complex and functional internal geometry, regulate significant flows of respiratory gases and maintain an internal microclimate with steep gradients in humidity and temperature towards the outside (Heyde et al., 2021). They gain their function primarily from geometry and can adapt to a surprising range of surrounding environments. Biological systems exhibit a strong coherence between form and function, and are able to draw benefits from highly complex and specific form. They can serve as a model not only for the direct relationship between form and performance, but also for the generative processes that enable organisms to produce such structures (Andréen and Goidea, 2022; Goidea et al., 2022).
The hypothesis tested in this paper is that the tunnel network found in the envelope of the mound can, when activated by transient air movements, generate a useful and controllable mass transport across the envelope. If such a flow can be selectively created within and across a permeable structure, it may provide a useful tool for semi-passive regulation of building climates and building envelope microclimates. The ambition of the paper is to provide a proof-of-concept for previously undocumented mechanisms and establish what geometric parameters can be used to control the effects.
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmats.2023.1126974/full
Citation: Andréen D and Soar R (2023) Termite-inspired metamaterials for flow-active building envelopes. Front. Mater. 10:1126974. doi: 10.3389/fmats.2023.1126974
Copyright © 2023 Andréen and Soar. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Something along similar lines was tried in Israel in the 1970s mimicking bees instead of termites.
As the article says ‘ … the interior space contained unusable walls, narrow balconies and slanted pentagonal windows that hardly provided any daylight … proving what many architects fail to comprehend: their intentions are meaningless [to] … individual users …’
Good Luck with that Open Air Flow construction…all of the building code modifications pushed by the Greenies for the Low Global Warming Construction in the last 20 years have been to make buildings Air Tight…mandating testing new buildings for air leakage. if they really wanted to reduce the energy load…outlaw Air Conditioning…everyone can live and work in buildings as they did in the 1960’s and before…sic…but then the windows would have to be constructed so they can be opened…Oh NO…then in the cold times, everyone can just stay home, go mostly dormant like the termites do!
Fair enough, outlaw air conditioning for the serfs. Of course that can’t apply to the elite.
In 1982 researchers reported that termites produced twice as much CO2 as all the world’s smokestacks…and they produce methane too….bad bad termites.
No worries, the serfs can eat termites.
“and a negligible carbon dioxide footprint.”
Termites are one of the largest natural sources of CO2 and CH4..
Try again, dolts !
Further proof they want to herd everybody into crowded urban towers.
That won’t do. The serfs have to be out working in the fields or the elite would starve. The towers you’re thinking about are just temporary concentration camp barracks prior to the Great Cull.
Once upon a tie there was a fairly effective widely followed design strategy called open the window.
If anything, they should look to older homes and buildings (early 20th century and earlier) as those were built with natural ventilation and lighting in mind. AC and electricity weren’t available 100+ years ago (well, some places had electricity, but not many) and homes and commercial buildings were constructed to take advantage of natural ventilation and daylight.
Turn of the last century homes (and earlier) had large and numerous windows compared to most modern homes. Many of those old homes also had large porches as well. And then there was the summer kitchen – a room that may (or may not) be connected to the home but was able to be closed off so as to keep the heat from cooking out of the main house.
Exhaust hoods help, but still, modern homes are designed so that the air (and heat) from the kitchen gets circulated thru out the house and makes the AC unit work harder.
Nope, not reading it. Can’t imagine offices being designed as tunnels.
My degree is in chemical engineering, in the second year we moved into a brand new building circa 1969, there were no opening windows and lots of glass.
The solar gain was horrendous until one day about a month into the use of the new building, and it was the heat transfer prof, who said f*** it and threw his chair through the window to loud applause from all of us suffering from a hang over from the previous nights bar session.
When I went to Stevens, the dorms were on a bluff overlooking the Hudson River. The campus steam plant was down below. One time the facility manager remarked that he would regulate the steam flow to the dorms by looking at how many windows were open in the dorms.
And yes, the climate glitterati/worriers, DO act like insects.
Like annoying gnats and cockroaches.
Have these fools not heard of courtyards and open windows?
The chimney effect has been known for thousands of years.
These people appear to not have noticed that mound building termites live in the warmer parts of the planet. Their architect in their mounds is for cooling their habitat. Most humans require heating in their habitat, much less need of cooling
There’s nothing surprising about this article since schools of architecture were in the vanguard of the postmodern movement that now infests most of academia. From Bauhaus to Brutalism to eventually joining our ancestors in poking in the dirt with a sharp stick, the path ‘forward’ is clear.
There are several concepts, some used for hundreds of years. Here are two:
https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20210810-the-ancient-persian-way-to-keep-cool
The curing of Roquefort cheese:
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/travel/how-much-longer-roquefort-reign-king-cheese-180978999/
As to the first article, they complain of the electrical use to power cooling.
Just build more nuclear power plant. Problem solved.
Er, we already have this in the old housing stock in the UK. The walls already allow airflow in and out, except up until now the powers that be have been banging on about ‘cavity insulation’. Unless the authors of the paper had in mind apartment complexes and office blocks, in which case, good luck to you. Not sure how you get termite tunnels into massive panes of glass, and I’m pretty sure you wouldn’t want them in the load-bearing concrete pillars…
They do not realise that it has been tried and failed before.
They did a big experiment around the North Pole then failed to repeat ir around the South Pole
Arctic try, Antarctic fail.
Geoff S
Here we witness actual proof that parallel universes really do exist.
OK, parallel in time maybe but most the other dimensions within them are completely warped and non-parallel
“Climate-smart” – any argument including that phrase indicates disqualification of whoever posted it.
I had a termite as a pet once. I named it Clint, Clint Eatswood.
I wonder who paid for them to produce this rubbish? Why do I think it either a fascist charity or the poor old taxpayers.
So termites live in comfortable, dehumidified, temperature-controlled mounds, year round? Give me a break. These clowns can go build it and live there first.
Mention climate and you can get any study funded with government money and lauded in You Reek Alert; no matter how impracticably hair-brained.
You Reek Alot
I live in the outer suburbs, in the coutryside, away from the city centre, where ant hills are quite common. Whenever I drive to the city centre, with myriads of roads and traffic congestion, and tall buildings, I can’t help thinking ‘this is like a Homo Sapien Ant Hill’.